hf101 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Here’s the explanation via NHL.com’s Situation Room Blog: At 16:45 of the second period in the San Jose Sharks/New York Rangers game, the Situation Room initiated video review to further examine Carl Hagelin’s wraparound attempt on the San Jose net. No camera angles provided to the Situation Room provided a clear image of the puck completely across the goal line. As a result, video review was inconclusive, therefore the referee’s call on the ice stands – no goal New York Rangers. video in the link http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2014/03/16/rangers-foiled-by-sharks-niemi-controversial-no-goal/related/ Referee clearly out of position. I'm not sure what Toronto saw, but that puck was in the net. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jammer2 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 @hf101 That SUCKS. That disallowed goal cost me both save percentage and GAA in fantasy! I was robbed I tell ya!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishbulb Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 That's clearly over the line imo... how can it be completely behind the post and not be over the line?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yave1964 Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 these officials have been brutal down the stretch. who in Toronto reviewed this one? Randy Carlyle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanflyer Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 Referee clearly out of position. I'm not sure what Toronto saw, but that puck was in the net. I am not sure I agree. The ref was where they normally are on that play (back corner / behind the net). Even if the ref is directly behind the net, I am not sure he sees the puck there. It took super slow mo in HD to see that puck go across. Even Hagalan didn't react right away. He thought "maybe". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyerrod Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 (edited) OK, 1 more team lost at least a point because of poor reffing in the Metropolitan Division.Now only 6 more bad calls need to be made(against any opponents in the Metro) to even up the rest of the division.....that is much easier than admitting the referees have screwed up........ This is taking into account the call that screwed Hartnell and the Flyers out of at least a point the other night. Edited March 17, 2014 by flyerrod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanflyer Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 xOK, 1 more team lost at least a point because of poor reffing in the Metropolitan Division.Now only 6 more bad calls need to be made(against any opponents in the Metro) to even up the rest of the division.....that is much easier than admitting the referees have screwed up........ This is taking into account the call that screwed Hartnell and the Flyers out of at least a point the other night. I did not like the devils game call. I have respected your posts for a long time, but the whine you post above? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyerrod Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 I did not like the devils game call. I have respected your posts for a long time, but the whine you post above? Really? Not sure what I am "whining" about..I am merely pointing out that the refs have taken away obvious points from 2 teams in the Metro division so far...to make it even in the division they have a few teams to go. That is called the BCF...or Bettman Correction Factor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanflyer Posted March 18, 2014 Share Posted March 18, 2014 .I am merely pointing out that the refs have taken away obvious points from 2 teams in the Metro division so far. I just don't see the Rangers game as "taking away" points. The Devils game for sure, but not the Rangers game. Just my dense opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.