Popular Post radoran Posted August 26, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted August 26, 2021 (edited) https://www.nhl.com/flyers/news/flyers-sign-sean-couturier-to-eight-year-contract-extension/c-326026982 Couturier, IMO, takes a bit of a pay cut for long term stability with the Flyers. Solid signing. Could easily be the C after G. *considers coining term CeeGees* Edited August 26, 2021 by radoran 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Podein25 Posted August 26, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted August 26, 2021 Not bad for a kid who can't skate 3 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCFlyguy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 I love Couts, but that's too long. He's going to turn 38 during the last year of that contract. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post radoran Posted August 26, 2021 Author Popular Post Share Posted August 26, 2021 19 minutes ago, SCFlyguy said: I love Couts, but that's too long. He's going to turn 38 during the last year of that contract. They got him to forego free agency and take lower than he probably is worth on the open market (again). That costs something, and that something in this case is term. If he has radically declined at 37/38, the buyout option doesn't look terribly onerous, either. 5 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkscrewy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 he wants a top 10 guy who doesn't get older with every season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCFlyguy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 I'd settle for no 8 year contracts for 29/30 year olds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mojo1917 Posted August 26, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted August 26, 2021 @SCFlyguy I think I'd be more worried if Couturier's game was dependent upon speed. It's not. His game is vision, hands, and positioning, some of those skills actually get better with age. I think the chances are good he will be an effective player at the end of that contract. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojo1917 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 This signing pleases me greatly. 14 is one of my favorites and is Mrs Mojo's favorite not named Carter Hart (whom she's hoping to be called son-in-law one day) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkscrewy Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 21 minutes ago, mojo1917 said: This signing pleases me greatly. 14 is one of my favorites and is Mrs Mojo's favorite not named Carter Hart (whom she's hoping to be called son-in-law one day) thanks for the reminder, Mojo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ruxpin Posted August 26, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted August 26, 2021 I'm good with this. I get the concern about the end of the contract, but at some point a window needs to open. You can't ever get to that if you're going to allow your best players to ride off into the sunset because you're not willing to give them a contract with some length when they can get it elsewhere just walking down the street. So, the alternative is just let him walk next year? And replace with what? Yeah, age 35-38 will be rough, but there's also this reality thing regarding what you have to do NOW. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howie58 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 I wonder what this says about term/length of resigning G? That must have been part of the reckoning. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 1 hour ago, ruxpin said: So, the alternative is just let him walk next year? Playing Devils advocate here for a second. He'll to the nah. I'm trading him at the trade deadline for who knows a nice return... ...and maybe for his eventual replacement in a few years when this player in returns is ready. You never know just saying... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyercanuck Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Wow...so Fletcher isn't a complete idiot?!? That's not a bad signing at all. Of course the term is a bit long but Couts could have easily got $9ish mil on the open market. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 (edited) Man they have came a long ways.... Raffl-Giroux-Simmonds Read-Couturier-Voracek White-B. Schenn-Umberger VandeVelde-Bellemare-Rinaldo Schultz-Streit Del Zotto-L. Schenn Colaiacovo-MacDonald Mason Neuvy Edited August 26, 2021 by OccamsRazor #boubonup 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radoran Posted August 26, 2021 Author Share Posted August 26, 2021 2 hours ago, Howie58 said: I wonder what this says about term/length of resigning G? That must have been part of the reckoning. Meltzer speculating/reporting that Giroux is expected to take a pay cut to finish his career in Philly, providing stability for his family. The number he had was in the 6-6.5 range. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howie58 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 11 minutes ago, radoran said: Meltzer speculating/reporting that Giroux is expected to take a pay cut to finish his career in Philly, providing stability for his family. The number he had was in the 6-6.5 range. Rad: Thanks for the post. The hometown discount makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howie58 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 11 minutes ago, radoran said: Meltzer speculating/reporting that Giroux is expected to take a pay cut to finish his career in Philly, providing stability for his family. The number he had was in the 6-6.5 range. Rad: Thanks for the post. The hometown discount makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lindbergh31 Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 1 hour ago, radoran said: Meltzer speculating/reporting that Giroux is expected to take a pay cut to finish his career in Philly, providing stability for his family. The number he had was in the 6-6.5 range. I like the Coots signing and the Flyers should take the "C" off of Giroux and give it to Coots. As for resigning Giroux, if the Flyers aren't in the playoffs at the deadline try trading Claude to a contender. And if he wants to resign in Philly then offer him a 3 year deal at $6 million per year. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 3 hours ago, OccamsRazor said: Playing Devils advocate here for a second. He'll to the nah. I'm trading him at the trade deadline for who knows a nice return... ...and maybe for his eventual replacement in a few years when this player in returns is ready. You never know just saying... Yeah i get that But at some point you have to create the window. I know you know this and you're doing the devil's advocate thing, but for others: you have to create the window at some point. So what? You trade him at the deadline and get prospects or picks and kick the can 3-5 years. Just in time for Provorov and others to get paid, but you trade them because, by golly, you'll get prospects or picks and another 3-5 years.... We now have 5 years. Build, Chucky, build! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCFlyguy Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 $6M is not a discount; that would be market rate for a player Giroux's age putting up his numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 9 hours ago, ruxpin said: Yeah i get that But at some point you have to create the window. I know you know this and you're doing the devil's advocate thing, but for others: you have to create the window at some point. So what? You trade him at the deadline and get prospects or picks and kick the can 3-5 years. Just in time for Provorov and others to get paid, but you trade them because, by golly, you'll get prospects or picks and another 3-5 years.... We now have 5 years. Build, Chucky, build! So that window is coming up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radoran Posted August 27, 2021 Author Share Posted August 27, 2021 10 hours ago, SCFlyguy said: $6M is not a discount; that would be market rate for a player Giroux's age putting up his numbers. Of players 33 and older last year who scored as many or more points than Giroux, nobody made $6M. Marchand made $6.1M on a deal signed in 2017, Bergeron made $6.8M on a deal signed in 2014. Of players that signed at 33+ who are in Giroux's points level, you have Joe Pavelski at $7M on deal signed in 2019. $6M may not be much of a "discount" but it's not "market rate" assuming Giroux continues to produce at ~.8 ppg. There's a better argument to be made that it's too much. Not that it matters - the Flyers are going to re-sign Giroux barring a complete collapse this season. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruxpin Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, OccamsRazor said: So that window is coming up? One would think. If not, management completely bungled an opportunity away. That "if not" statement is at least even money from my vantage, but if not, it really doesn't matter whether we keep Coots or not. Or anyone else for that matter. But if you're perpetually leaving your best players go at 29/30 because you're not willing to stomach the cost of doing business, you'll be forever in the "foundational" stage of drafting/grooming prospects just so they can move on to an actual NHL franchise when they're fully grown and seasoned. Edited August 27, 2021 by ruxpin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCFlyguy Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, radoran said: $6M may not be much of a "discount" but it's not "market rate" assuming Giroux continues to produce at ~.8 ppg. There's a better argument to be made that it's too much. Agreed. Edited August 27, 2021 by SCFlyguy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OccamsRazor Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 (edited) 48 minutes ago, radoran said: Not that it matters - the Flyers are going to re-sign Giroux barring a complete collapse this season. Yep. Chuckles has said this much "We want him here as long as he wants to be here..." Is all you need to know. Glancing at Risto well I would hope G leaves at least 500K on the table to go towards resigning Riskolaienien. That is of course with expectations that the roll of the dice worked in the Flyers favor of him bringing some of what they were lacking and looking like it was a smart move. If not well let's say I don't want to think about if it doesn't work out... Edited August 27, 2021 by OccamsRazor #boubonup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.