CoachX

again.....

yes. they hired chuk-fuk

youre so grumpy!

@OccamsRazor ive been lobbying for JG for a while now. i would love it. but at the risk of taking Chuk-fuk at his word, JG is prolly outside the age parameter they want. any move, ANY, that removes the lopsided melon, stupid looking face of the cancer known as JVR, should be done immediately in short JVR is SUK

DO IT! OUT (drop)

It is insane. Did you read that somewhere? If you really want to move on, we can discuss the Flyers signing JG

This is the original post. You said you want to move Coots for 2-3 pieces, then acknowledge you can't do it.

Where did you get this? They don't? Didn't you just say he was a 30 goal scorer? Or was that Coots? I'm really having a hard time keeping up with the contradictions And you read this where?

In your earlier post you said... "I’m wanting to move a guy like Coots for 2-3 pieces" .... now you are saying that isn't possible. Can you make up your mind here? You think TK is a 30 goal scorer. I don't think he is. Both are speculation. I dont think many GMs are going to think so either

@RonJeremy I really want to know where you are getting your info from. Where did CHI mention anything? I haven't read a single story where they said what they want. The Flyers don't have a balanced lineup, with solid players throughout. They won't get there with this lineup either. They have to make moves I have not mentioned, or read, Yorks name being connected to anything

Who's gonna give you that return on those 2? At best you could only get a 1 for 1 swap. I appreciate your support for our Flyers, but you are way overvaluing these guys

Sheesh man, what are you giving up for him? I never even mentioned prospects. Really? How does that happen? If you don't improve the lineup, you're going to suck like you did last season. Unless you think Torts is the difference What player will? And yes, I think a guy who can consistently score 35 to 40 goals a season will make a team better

You mean like, packaging him with the 5 to bring in a player who will immediately make the team better?

You're kinda making my point from earlier when I suggested moving multiple parts for AD

I realize I'm quoting myself, but what I mean to do is correct myself. I typed the above statement under duress....I couldn't find the remote again What I was trying to say, is the thought that trading the 5 pick for multiple assets, any worth having, isn't feasible if you don't have the cap room to sign those assets. I'm wondering, if CHI took TK, JVR and the 5, for AD, would that change any of these arguments ?

If they keep the 5, it's only ONE player. That doesn't fill "holes". At best, it's hopefully a good player to fill ONE spot. It doesnt equate to filling any more than that. AD is a top tier player right now, and will probably be better than what they draft at that position All of these arguments surround the point that any trade will be multiple assets for ONE player. Highly unlikely considering trading a draft pick for a guy with that kind of pricetag does not give you the cap space to sign him

REPORTED! YOU ARE FORBIDDEN FROM TALKING TO ME ANYMORE!

So you are saying that if they trade the #5 pick, its a good move? Would dealing assets for Alex DeBrincat be smart? If those players you mention, do what you indicate they might, does that make moving TK easier?

@pilldoc whats your take? Are the Flyers in on AD? Do you think it would be a good move? Personally I think AD is too old, or will be one day, is past his prime offensively, and won't be worth the contract the Flyers would give him....eventually

Not sure where you heard that. I've been reading every article I can find. They all say the Flyers are trying to make a deal maybe we have different internet

I really don't get your arguments at all... Argument 1: Flyer shouldn't trade multiple assets for a top offensive talent, because he wont win them a championship. ok. we know. who is actually thinking they are championship team? Argument 2: No team (specifically CHI) will take JVR. hmmm, well last year no tam would take Voracek. However, the Flyers can leverage the #5 to include JVR, or no deal. The biggest dead weight on this team, in terms of talent and cap, is JVR. Having the #5 can definitely get JVR out the door Argument 3: The team is better off with Provy and TK. sure, just like they were last season. You cant get without giving something Argument 4: Keep the #5 and draft a guy who will be ready IN TWO YEARS. I'm pretty sure you are convinced CF couldn't find his asss with both hands and a mirror, but you want to trust him with drafting the right guy. JVR and Patrick say hello You have been a staunch supporter of all the young guys in the system. I can get on board with that. But you don't want to move any of the existing players on the roster. The Flyers have come out and said they need top end talent. Thats an acknowledgement that dont think they have it. You can get it in the draft for sure, if you are good at drafting. But you can also get it by making trades. If you trade a valuable pick, that might possibly be a good player, for a guaranteed already really good player, that makes your team better.

i havent read that. If true, its absurd. There are a lot of reports that the Flyers are legitimate dealers for AD. I gotta believe a price tag that high, if known, would have eliminated the Flyers immediately

no player in the league is, so thats not a legit argument. This number 5 pick isnt goingto do it either if one of those assets is JVR, then yes we are. My recent trade idea was just me pulling it out of my ass. But, lets say TK, and Provy are moved, there have been numerous posts that Provy will be nothing more than a number 2 dman, and that TK might do better elsewhere. You have to give to get. And you Ellis to contend with, not to mention cap space So if you move 3 assets, clearing significant space, gut some of the roster, and bring back a player who if he was in the draft toady, would be a consensus top 5 pick, it would make sense