Jump to content

Howie58

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    5,881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by Howie58

  1. 14 minutes ago, AJgoal said:

     

    I actually see this as a good thing. If Patrick was worried about whether he'd play this coming season, he'd be more apt to go for maybe a two year deal. By just signing his QO, it tells me he thinks he'll play and play well enough to earn a bigger contract after next season.

    AJ:

     

    I hope you are right.  Your reasoning is good. But these numbers really, really shock me.  It's sad.  I hope the kid makes it. 

  2. 39 minutes ago, AJgoal said:

    Wow--a few weeks back, I pegged this at 2 years at about a million AAV.  This is not a vote of confidence in the guy's future.  Fletcher can chirp all he wants, this isn't much more than Pulliot's recent contract...for a career AHLer with an occasional cup of coffee. Yikes.

  3. Greetings:

     

    I just read a very sobering take on the coming season. It is likely to be 60 or fewer games, and the Can-Am border may be difficult to cross due to COVD, hence the discussion of a Canadian division.  From a fiscal standpoint, absence of gate receipts hurts hockey more than any of the big four.  Fletcher's approach makes a lot of sense under these circumstances.  Some of the small market franchises will be hit very, very hard.  FYI, the Phillies' owners pumped $100 million of their money to make up the operating deficit this year.  They are cutting staff brutally--J.J. Jackson's separation from the Phillies is due to the cuts.  The O and B have Comcast....others may not be so lucky.  

    • Like 1
  4. Greetings:

     

    Here's an interesting take on Fletcher's inactivity/caution.  I think the author is right--there was risk in not going after the big names, and there is risk in Fletcher's incremental approach:

     

    https://www.broadstreethockey.com/2020/10/15/21511027/philadelphia-flyers-nhl-offseason-analysis-chuck-fletcher-erik-gustafsson-roster-thoughts-risk

     

    I think we have faith in the process.  But as Ron Jeremy and I said last week, we go into this season without the kind of scoring firepower we'll see elsewhere.  I suspect we'll have no real 1st line but more of the 1a, 1b, 1c approach with a checking crew.  The defense is sort of collective head scratching.  Whether it's bourbon or merlot, there may be games we wonder about our lack of a sniper or a third pair defense ala Lasse Kukkonen, while we wait for Ward, Friedman, and Zemula to grow up. 

  5. The back-to-back signings of Wisdom and Foerster to ELCs is telling us a lot.  Fletcher really is serious about building from within. I am glad he is staying away from Silly Season.  Gus Bus is reasonable and short-term.  Building for the long-term counts and we don't need any more JVR-style contracts.  

    • Like 3
  6. The Gustaffson deal is strange on face. Maybe they are moving Ghost. Or maybe they think he is only two years removed from a 60 point season and might have some offense that helps.  At one year, this is not a long-term marriage. If you net out Pitlick, Grant, and Thompson, but add Pulliot in, we are still saving 1.7 million or so.  So this guy isn't adding a bunch.  And we still save Mr. Niskanen's 5 plus.  So, you bring in youngins for the fourth line and we see what happens.  I really don't think Nolan can expect a lot.  Myers--we see.  

     

    Our last big signing, JVR, doesn't expire.  If Chuckles is gun shy right now, fine.  

     

     

  7. Lindblom's health is a wildcard, but I assume/hope that the three-year extension reflected a good prognosis. I will be curious to see the offer to Patrick.  Per prior posts, I can't see this going more than two years.  If it does, it would be a great leap to faith that Fletcher shouldn't make.  

     

    As others have said, we may have over-achieved this year. Our Metro competitors are really loading up. I won't fault Fletcher for avoiding crazy overpay.  He might be playing a wait-and-see game with the coming season.  He might feel trades during the season are less costly. And he might get a read on where the youngins are going.  BTW, on Ghost, he might have gotten reads that nobody is that interested.  We may need to play him back to trade-ability, for something worthwhile, or a bag of pucks.  

     

    I agree with Ron Jeremy and other other that this team will probably be playing a defensive style of play given the absence of snipers/creative types.  Maybe we grow them?  Meanwhile, the last few playoff games may be an indicator of what we're facing unless some of the newbies show something we don't have now. 

    • Good Post 1
  8. 13 minutes ago, CoachX said:

    Can you explain what you mean? What action do they take to accomplish this?

    Greetings:

     

    I suspect it is either buyout or trade with salary contribution.  That is not a fun thing to contemplate but look at what happened with Turris and others.  At some point, a team's management says we absorb the sunk costs but move forward.  Shoot, I am not sure we're done with Bryzgalov....  We did it (cheaply) with Umberger.  We did it (in part) with Vinny.  

     

    If it isn't done now, I suspect some people on the squad will be offered as rentals with salary absorption.  That is grim but so is my outlook.  If we got a high pick for one of our elders, plus a prospect, I'd say fine.  This is becoming a young person's league.  The speed and cap seem to drive it there.  I don't think you can get sentimental about owning a particular stock.  I don't think you can do that as a GM with a certain player.  

    • Like 1
  9. Trying to be a arbiter and peacemaker, I'd say that the truth is in the middle.  I do think the youngins should be brought in and given enough rope to hang themselves. If our pool is as good as the pundits say, the sooner we find out, the better.

     

    Corey Perry and Joe Pavelsky were 35+ and very good in the finals.  That said, I have some concerns about our 8 million dollar brigade.  We may need to bit the bullet with one of them, or maybe JVR, to send a signal about accountability and build on a better player foundation.  I posted my thread about 2008 Redux for a good reason.  We thought that was the beginning of a new era and it really wasn't, SCF two years later aside.  I am worried that the current group is sort of mixed bag that AV over-achieved with.  We probably need to grow a core together.  And as I said two nights ago, I look at what the rest of the Metro looks like and wonder how we will compete?

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  10. 7 hours ago, CoachX said:

    draft over! FA is here!

     

    What do the flyers do? I think Grant, Thompson and Pitlick are UFA. I only sign Pitlick.  I'd like to see the Flyers push for Duclair or Athanasiou

     

    I still think Laine ends up in Philly

     

    ** Statsny goes back to Jets. This shoots down that theory 

    Pitlick to AZ for two years, AAV of 1.75.  

  11. 3 hours ago, mojo1917 said:

    think the team must be willing to let these guys fail some. 

    For the record I don't think either will, but IMO it's time to take off the training wheels, take some lumps and play the youth.

    Dear Mojo, 

    I agree with you.  My question about Turris was more wake-up during a downtime. I would love to see a cohort of youngins grow together. That would build our team.  People speak highly of Frost.  If he is ready...OK.  Patrick's situation is strange and I guess we see what happens in a few days regarding his offer.   We will also see what happens with Pitlick and the others soon enough.  

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  12. Greetings:

     

    I normally wouldn't think about this, but if he were dirt cheap for a year, I might say it would be worth kicking the rubber.  His last year was not good, but as this piece notes, he might not have been too well deployed.

     

    https://www.ontheforecheck.com/2020/9/30/21473717/2019-20-nashville-predators-player-report-cards-season-review-kyle-turris-trade-buyout

     

    I recall he had a great shot.  Do we think our draft picks are ready?  What might happen with Patrick?  Just a thought.

     

     

     

  13. 3 minutes ago, RonJeremy said:

    We have them all beat in goaltending, but we have to somehow get or hope someone develops into a real game changer to match the best players on the other teams.

    Hello:

     

    Yep, and that's why we have to wonder it's possible to jettison some of our "elders."  My other observation is that we seem to be going for a defense-first approach (overall, not thinking about last night), while this division, with Carolina at the top, seems to be aiming for blitzkrieg hockey.  

  14. I've read a few reviews of this guy.  I'd say this is high risk and high reward.  He has a cannon shot and sounds like an anchor for a power play.  The skating assessment ranges from awful to fixable to so-what, as you heard on the tube.  If nothing else, it's a departure from centers and defenders. 

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 1 Anonymous, 39 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...