I voted no for the use of Hybrid icing because it doesn't work. For those that don't know what it is, Hybrid icing is a mixture of touch and no-touch icing. It gives a linesman the discretion to blow his whistle and stop the play if he believes a defending player will reach the puck first. If the linesman believes the attacking player has a chance to reach the puck first, he lets the race to the puck play out. The linesman always will side with the defending player and will blow his whistle if he feels the race is a tie by the time the players reach the faceoff dots. The AHL was using Hybrid Icing this year until the NHL lockout ended and they scrapped it. Here is their *public release* reason: "We believe that 564 games has been a sufficient test period for 'hybrid icing,' and that the application of the rule has been positive for the most part," AHL president Dave Andrews said in a statement Tuesday. "But because we have more than 300 players recalled to the National Hockey League each season, it is our view that these players should have the benefit of a consistent application of the icing rule in both the AHL and NHL." The problem was the rule and it's application was very confusing. The players were confused because there is too much subjective judgement on the icing plays and no consistency to the calls. Players were always questioning/arguing with the linesmen after the calls. The only way to prevent the injuries in to use the same icing rule that is used by youth hockey & the NCAA...No Touch Icing. When the puck crosses the icing (goal) line, the whistle blows.